Effect of Digestion Method, Siderite Content, and Fizz Rating on Neutralization Potential of Overburden Samples

Agricultural & Natural Resources Development Home Page | Land Reclamation Home Page | Effect of Digestion Method, Siderite Content, and Fizz Rating on Neutralization Potential of Overburden Samples

Table 6. NP values (metric tons per 1000 metric tons) using the Sobek Hand Method (without using H2O2) from three laboratories (WVU, PADEP, and CONSOL) on 31 overburden samples. Fizz ratings were determined independently by each laboratory1.

WVU PADEP CONSOL Difference

Sample Fizz NP Fizz NP Fizz NP High - Low
Fe
1 1 70 1 89 0 29 60*2
2 1 62 1 88 0 25 63*
3 1 63 1 87 0 14 73*
4 1 62 1 93 3 445 383*
5 1 64 1 82 0 26 56*
6 2 367 3 607 3 363 244*
Ca
1 3 926 3 928 3 936 10
2 3 835 2 500 3 837 337*
3 3 711 3 743 3 724 32
S
1 0 -23 0 -39 0 -27 16
2 1 78 0 44 0 77 34*
3 0 17 1 80 0 23 63*
4 0 -1 0 -1 0 -1 0
5 0 23 1 25 0 4 21*
Si
1 0 5 0 11 0 7 6
2 0 2 0 6 0 4 4
3 0 2 0 5 0 3 3
4 0 15 1 32 0 17 15*
5 2 64 1 61 0 54 10*
6 0 -1 0 5 0 0 6
7 0 -5 0 1 0 -3 6
8 0 -7 0 1 0 -5 8
9 0 -2 0 1 0 -4 5
10 0 18 0 14 0 20 6
11 1 40 1 73 0 22 51*
12 0 23 0 36 0 15 21
13 2 113 3 155 0 122 42*
14 0 7 0 12 0 7 5
15 1 23 1 40 0 6 34*
16 0 17 1 62 1 27 45*
17 1 88 1 95 1 50 45

mean difference = 55.0

1All the labs digested samples according to fizz ratings and corresponding strengths and volumes of HCl (Table 2).

2Indicates that the laboratories assigned a different fizz rating to this sample.

Effect of Digestion Method, Siderite Content, and Fizz Rating on Neutralization Potential of Overburden Samples