
Introduction
Capital Investment Expenditures
Timberland Accounts
An Example of a Timberland Purchase
Retroactive Allocation of Capital Expenditures
Using Information Allocated to Accounts
Introduction
Income taxes that affect timber returns are continually changing. A taxpayer can mitigate some of
these effects, however, by understanding basic tax law. Strategies should be developed to recapture
investment capital as efficiently as possible, take advantage of limited incentives left in the law, and
match passive timber income with passive losses. This article reviews considerations for recovering
capital expenditures and briefly touches on smoothing income flows to minimize passive losses.
Capital Investment Expenditures
Tax regulations provide the general rule that an expenditure that creates an asset having a useful
life greater than one year must be capitalized. This simply means recording expenditures (basis) in a
set of books for recovery when assets are disposed of, used up, wear out, or become obsolete. Land,
timber, buildings, fences, and equipment are examples of capital assets that may be included in the
acquisition of timber holdings. The basis is the cost of purchase, the estate valuation for inheritances,
or the donor's basis in a gift adjusted to include any gift tax paid on appreciation in value.
| (1) Account Type | (2) Estimate of FMV | (3) Percent of FMV | (4) Allocation of Acquisition Cost | (5) Original Basis |
| Land | $30,000 | 35.3 | $1,765 | $31,765 |
| Merchantable Sawtimber | $37,500 | 44.1 | $2,206 | $39,706 |
| Merchantable Pulpwood | $13,500 | 15.9 | $794 | $14,294 |
| Premerchantable Timber | $4,000 | 4.7 | $235 | $4,235 |
| Total | $85,000 | 100.0 | $5,000 | $90,000 |
| (1) Account Type | (2) Estimate of FMV | (3) Percent of FMV | (4) Allocation of Estate Variation |
| Land | $30,000 | 35.3 | $24,710 |
| Merchantable Sawtimber | $37,500 | 44.1 | $30,870 |
| Merchantable Pulpwood | $13,500 | 15.9 | $11,130 |
| Premerchantable Timber | $4,000 | 4.7 | $3,290 |
| Total | $85,000 | 100.0 | $70,000 |
Retroactive valuation is subject to IRS approval, as is any entry on your tax return. The burden of proof rests with the taxpayer to make a case for values that could have reasonably been expected to occur at the time of inheritance.
The decision on how much energy should be expended to establish a basis retroactively is a benefit versus cost question. The benefit arises from the tax deduction that will be obtained with the disposal of the various assets. The cost is the amount required to assemble the appropriate information for the allocation. Obviously, the more complex the assets and the earlier the original assets were acquired, the more difficult it will be to reconstruct the information in a manner that will satisfy the IRS.
Using Information Allocated to Accounts
How do you use the information in the basis? Assume that five years have elapsed since the
original property in the example shown in Table 1 was acquired. In order to improve growth and to
promote higher valued solid wood products, your forester has recommended a thinning that will
remove 400 cords from the 30-acre pulpwood stand. The original basis in the merchantable pulpwood
stand was $14,294, and the original quantity was 900 cords. In the five-year interval, the pulpwood
stand has grown an additional 250 cords, and the premerchantable stand has reached merchantability
with an estimated volume of 350 cords. The proposed sale will bring $25 per cord if offered in a lump
sum sale (Section 1221), and the cost of sale will be $800. How do you handle the account and report
the results for tax purposes?
If the accounts are combined by transferring the premerchantable account to the merchantable
pulpwood account, the adjusted basis will be $14,294 + $4,235 = $18,529 and the adjusted quantity
will be 900 cords + 250 cords + 350 cords = 1,500 cords. The depletion unit, determined by
dividing the adjusted basis by the adjusted quantity, will be $12.35 ($18,529 1,500 cords) per cord.
Total depletion for the proposed thinning will be $12.35 x 400 cords = $4,941. The net taxable gain is
$10,000 - ($4,941 + $800) = $4,259, obtained by subtracting depletion of basis and cost of sale from
the gross revenue from the sale. This lump sum sale, presuming that it will otherwise qualify as a
capital gain, will be reported on Part II, Schedule D of Form 1040.
The timber sale (thinning) provided net capital gains income and improved the vigor of the timber
stand. If the landowner in the example is absentee and is having trouble satisfying the requirements for
material participation on this investment, what alternatives are possible? Assume for the moment that
this activity is passive and that the property tax and management costs have averaged $600 per year. A
total of $3,000 in passive losses have been suspended. The deduction of the suspended losses reduces
the taxable gain to $1,259 ($4,259 - $3,000). The landowner also has the option of using installment
payments to cover anticipated losses for two additional tax years by scheduling the receipt of amounts
over $3,000 into two additional tax years. Take $3,000 in the year of the sale in order to recover the
accumulated suspended passive losses, take $600 dollars the following year, and take the balance in the
third year. The rules for installment sales must be observed to include interest on future payments
received more than six months after the original payment at an applicable interest rate. It is also good
business practice to deal with a reputable buyer or have your attorney arrange future payments through
a third party escrow account. The installment payments must be structured so that you do not have a
constructive receipt of the future payments or the income will be accelerated for tax purposes.
The lack of a capital gains differential, the competitive market conditions, and today's restrictive
passive loss rules make it imperative to develop strategies for handling timber investments, revenues,
and costs to maximize financial advantage. The scale of the example is small, but it should suggest a
few of the possibilities for legitimate timber owners who want to keep growing timber as an investment
or as a trade or business that will be competitive with
other uses of their capital.
Dr. Harry L. Haney, Jr., is a Garland Gray Professor and Extension Specialist
in Forest Management - Economics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University. He is a nationally recognized expert on timber taxation and author
of numerous articles on the subject.
Last modified Oct. 22, 1997
Comments to:Extension Service Web