• Retreat Overview-August 2004
• Pilot Study Application Procedures
• Seminars & Seminar Committee Members
• News & Events
• Core Technologies
• WVU Systems Biology Members
Links of Interest
• SOLE (Restricted to Systems Biology Members)
• Systems Biology Markup Language
• WVU HOME
Systems Biology Pilot Study Application Procedure
|Call for proposals
|Letter of Intent
|| September 1
|Response to applicants by committee
|Full Proposal Due
|| October 1
|*subject to fund availability
- Letter of Intent (max 1 page)
Title of proposal
Paragraph (max 1 page) describing
b. Significance of the potential findings/work emphasizing SyB aspects
- Full Proposal (max 3 pages) – one year funding period
Budget (max $15,000) and justification
Significance (emphasizing SyB aspects)
Methods/potential results/potential problems and solutions
- Progress report – at 6 months (max 1 page) & termination (max 3 pages)
Synopsis of data collected and significance
Future funding/publication plans
Appendix -Budget expenditure report
- Review criteria
Systems biology approach (mandatory)
Future extramural funding plans (mandatory)
Soundness of the proposed experiments/approach by the usual NIH criteria, i.e., significance, approach, innovation, investigator and environment.
Applications involving faculty across colleges/schools given highest priority
b. Applications involving faculty across departments within a college/school given high priority
- Review panel
a. SyBI Director
b. Member of Steering Committee (1)
- Full Proposal
a. Members of Steering Committee (2)
b. WVU/External reviewer (optional – as needed) (1)
Funding Decision – vote of Steering Committee
Letter of Intent
Email submissions to firstname.lastname@example.org encouraged (MS Word, ‘pdf’ or WordPerfect format).
Otherwise, send letter of intent to:
John B. Barnett, Ph.D.
System Biology Initiative
P.O. Box 9178 WVU
NIH Evaluation Criteria –
SIGNIFICANCE: Does this study address an important problem? If the aims of the application are achieved, how will scientific knowledge be advanced? What will be the effect of these studies on the concepts or methods that drive this field?
APPROACH: Are the conceptual framework, design, methods, and analyses adequately developed, well-integrated, and appropriate to the aims of the project? Does the applicant acknowledge potential problem areas and consider alternative tactics?
INNOVATION: Does the project employ novel concepts, approaches or methods? Are the aims original and innovative? Does the project challenge existing paradigms or develop new methodologies or technologies?
INVESTIGATOR: Is the investigator appropriately trained and well suited to carry out this work? Is the work proposed appropriate to the experience level of the Principal Investigator and other researchers (if any)?
ENVIRONMENT: Does the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Do the proposed experiments take advantage of unique features of the scientific environment or employ useful collaborative arrangements? Is there evidence of [department/college/school] support?